84th Academy Awards Nominations Announced « the diary of a film awards fanatic

iamsambell:

oldfilmsflicker:

These are the categories they announced live, the rest will be added as soon as they’re released.

Best Picture:
The Artist
The Descendants
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
The Help
Hugo
Midnight in Paris
Moneyball
The Tree of Life
War Horse

Best Director:
Michel Hazanavicius – The Artist
Alexander Payne – The Descendants
Martin Scorsese – Hugo
Woody Allen – Midnight in Paris
Terrence Malick – The Tree of Life

Best Actor:
Jean Dujardin – The Artist
Demián Bichir – A Better Life
George Clooney – The Descendants
Brad Pitt – Moneyball
Gary Oldman – Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

Best Actress:
Glenn Close – Albert Nobbs
Rooney Mara – The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Viola Davis – The Help
Meryl Streep – The Iron Lady
Michelle Williams – My Week With Marilyn

Best Supporting Actor:
Christopher Plummer – Beginners
Max Von Sydow – Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
Jonah Hill – Moneyball
Kenneth Branagh – My Week with Marilyn
Nick Nolte – Warrior

Best Supporting Actress
Janet McTeer – Albert Nobbs
Bérénice Bejo – The Artist
Melissa McCarthy – Bridesmaids
Jessica Chastain – The Help
Octavia Spencer – The Help

Best Animated Feature
A Cat In Paris
Chico and Rita
Kung Fu Panda 2
Puss In Boots
Rango

Best Adapted Screenplay:
The Descendants – Alexander Payne and Nat Faxon & Jim Rash
Hugo – John Logan
The Ides of March – George Clooney and Grant Heslov
Moneyball – Aaron Sorkin, Steven Zaillian and Stan Chervin
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy – Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughn

Best Original Screenplay:
The Artist – Michel Hazanavicius
Bridesmaids – Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo
Margin Call – JC Chandor
Midnight In Paris – Woody Allen
A Separation – Asghar Farhadi

Best Foreign Film
A Separation (Iran)
In Darkness (Poland)
Footnote (Israel)
Bullhead (Belgium)
Monsieur Lazhar (Canada)

I’m extremely happy for Terrence Malick and The Tree of Life, but where is Drive or Melancholia, especially Kirsten Dunst?

EDIT: Oh, and also Shame and Michael Fassbender…

So Iamsambell says pretty much exactly what I was going to say. I will add however what a pleasant surprise it was to see J. C Chandor get a nom for Margin Call, it really was rather excellent, and having seen it on the same day as Moneyball (and thus determining that it is a valid comparison to make) it was significantly better (I liked Moneyball, about as much as I expected to, but it was good and not great which I feel that Margin Call was).

Nevertheless the Oscar’s are always a disappointment and always seem restricted to such obvious choices. I’ll post my predictions at some point, but with little enthusiasm.  

Top 10 Films of 2011

A note about how these were picked: essentially they’re films I saw in the cinema in 2011 and which weren’t rereleases (otherwise both Apocalypse Now and Days of Heaven would be sitting very near the top of the list). Considering I watch a lot of films at Film Unit and that we get films later than most cinemas, I may be including stuff that was technically released in 2010 (I haven’t bothered to check). There’s also one film that I saw very early at a press screening – it’s UK release date was 2012 but I saw it in 2011 so yes, I’ve employed that most strict of criteria: my own viewing schedule. Obviously there’s stuff I didn’t see that would probably warrant a place on this list if I had.

10. Arrietty

9. Tree of Life

8. The Skin I Live In

7. Hanna

6. Melancholia

5. Beginners

4. Animal Kingdom

3. The Guard

2. Shame

1. Drive

 

A few additional comments:

Drive was always going to be top – after seeing it with a few friends none of us could shut up about it for weeks afterwards. I’ve been a fan of Refn for ages and I think he’s turning into one of the best directors currently working. Everything about Drive is pitch perfect. To put it simply: its bloody brilliant.

I kind of feel that Shame is probably a more important work than Drive, but it is also something that I’d struggle to watch again. McQueen is an intense director, both Shame and Hunger are difficult, uncomfortable works but that is precisely what they should be considering the subject matter. McQueen comes across as a master in perfect control of his work – and as ever Fassbender delivers an exceptional performance – definitely the best of the year (though not quite as good as his performance in Hunger).

The Guard was one of those films that completely surpassed my expectations – same with Hanna – I’d heard good things but was essentially unsuspecting of how fantastic they would be.

The Guard has some unsurprising similarities with In Bruges but I felt that it was better in every single way – Gleeson is fantastic, the writing hilarious, and the story more engaging. I was totally unprepared for how emotional it was. I’ve tried (seemingly hopelessly) to try and convince everyone I know to see it – it seems to have drastically overlooked by a lot of people.

Hanna was just kick-ass – it’s rare I enjoy an action film but Hanna was superbly directed and choreographed; a perfect example of how to shoot action without making it a barrage of noise, editing and bewilderment. The soundtrack was of course excellent. The ending located in an abandoned theme park allowed for some quite surreal sequences which I loved. Tom Hollander’s performance was terrifying – that whistle…

Animal Kingdom was breathtaking – dark, tense, and arresting. I had huge expectations for it and it easily surpassed them. It comes across as uncomfortably realistic.

Beginners was, again, a pleasant surprise, wonderfully funny, occasionally heartbreaking and, of course, the lovely Melanie Laurent means it is definitely something I’ll return to. Christopher Plummer deserves every award he gets as well.

Tree of Life actually counts as a disappointment, but my expectations were so high for it that it still warrants a place on the list. It’s unbelievably beautiful and thought-provoking but its deliberately loose structure is tiring at times. Still the universe scenes alone are some of finest scenes ever, and demonstrate the sheer wonder that cinema can provoke.

On a similar not Melancholia provides similar visual thrill, particularly in its opening shots. I was surprised to find that Melancholia  was nowhere near as difficult as I expected (Von Trier does of course have a certain reputation, and his much referred to “no more happy endings” statement affected my expectations). That’s not to say it’s exactly positive, melancholic is the easiest and most obvious description but it is fantastic film-making and a visionary take on depression and the end of the world.

The Skin I Live In was strange, twisted and shocking, as expected. It’s very difficult to describe, but certainly harder to forget.

Arrietty I’ve talked about before, sumptuous, beautiful and charming it is perhaps the easiest film to recommend on this list, if only because I can’t really imagine anyone not liking it.  

What Malick does in “The Tree of Life” is create the span of lives. Of birth, childhood, the flush of triumph, the anger of belittlement, the poison of resentment, the warmth of forgiving. And he shows that he feels what I feel, that it was all most real when we were first setting out, and that it will never be real in that way again. In the face of Hunter McCracken, who plays Jack as a boy, we see the face of Sean Penn, who plays him as a man. We see fierceness and pain. We see that he hates his father and loves him. When his father has a talk with him and says, “I was a little hard on you sometimes,” he says, “It’s your house. You can do what you want to.” And we realize how those are not words of anger but actually words of forgiveness. Someday he will be the father. It will not be so easy.
– If there was anyone who I was waiting to write about Tree of Life it was Roger Ebert. And now he has.
parislemon:

Early reaction seems pretty mixed, but I’m very excited for Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life. 

Excellent tweet, although on the subject of mixed reaction, according to Anne Thompson of Indiewire it played rather better at the official première in contrast to the press screening, awarded a “sustained standing ovation”. I for one cannot bloody wait. All I need is someone at the Cannes market to buy it for U.K distribution. 

parislemon:

Early reaction seems pretty mixed, but I’m very excited for Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life

Excellent tweet, although on the subject of mixed reaction, according to Anne Thompson of Indiewire it played rather better at the official première in contrast to the press screening, awarded a “sustained standing ovation”. I for one cannot bloody wait. All I need is someone at the Cannes market to buy it for U.K distribution. 

Fiona Shaw Talks Tree of Life

iamsambell:

‘He made it because he knows it will last’

 [Malick] is the opposite of a director. He rang me up and said, “This is Terrence Malick, I’m doing a film and I wonder could you help me with it.” He said, “I’d like you to write your own part.” I said, “What?!?” and then I wrote this stuff based on the character he described. When we came to filming, he said, “Where would you like to film these scenes? Would you like to do them indoors or outdoors?” because he is so fundamental in his understanding of what he’s doing that it doesn’t really matter to him whether you film it in a garden or a kitchen. He has the thing in his head, it’s not tied to a tiny schedule. He makes them with handheld cameras, in natural light in the town he’s taken over.”

Fuck you Icon.

David Thomson on Terrence Malick | Film | The Guardian

He may be the only film-maker working now to whom the word “magical” can be applied, yet in nearly 30 years he has directed just five films. He has a degree in philosophy from Harvard; he taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; he has published a translation of Heidegger’s Vom Wesen des Grundes. He has a reputation as a recluse, whereas in reality he is a charming, amiable fellow happy to talk about a wide range of topics – but not film. He came close once to doing a film of Walker Percy’s novel The Moviegoer, and in 1999 he did produce a picture about the great Ethiopian runner, Haile Gebrselassie, called Endurance. Then a year later he produced another documentary, The Endurance, about the polar explorer Ernest Shackleton.

And his fifth film, The Tree of Life, is supposed to have its world premiere in London on 4 May – yet it may not. It is a while since a Terrence Malick film opened according to expectations.

Why “magical”? It’s not just the uncertainty Malick spreads around himself – the Cannes film festival this year also hopes to have the world premiere of The Tree of Life, or even that there are rival contenders for which company has the right to release it. Far more, there is the legend whereby the film was conceived a long time ago and shot in 2009 (mostly in Texas), but that no one knows or will say what it’s about. There are vague reports that it concerns a boy from the 1950s who becomes a man, and there is a trailer (gorgeously beautiful and arresting) that suggests Sean Penn could be the grown man with Brad Pitt as his father. There is the conundrum as to whether it’s a small story about life or a vast portrait of Life. Why not both? Why not an actual tree (apparently an ancient oak in Texas) and the tree of life on which we are all leaves or bark?

What is “magical”? Well, it’s always the pristine imagery and the serene reach of a Malick film. This has been so since Badlands (1973), a version of the Charles Starkweather case, in which a kid and his girl went on a casual rampage of killing, which is also a vision of the first children in a flat-faced Eden. But it’s magic, too, because in this age of diminution and vulgarity at the movies, Malick conducts himself with the austerity of Chaplin and Kubrick – doing it his way, disdaining the press, but getting people to pay for it all. Never forget that a movie director is not just a master of imagery and drama, a conductor of actors, music and design. He is a guy who can persuade someone to put up millions on an airy conversation about life, plants, astronomy and philosophy. This is more than magic. It is the nerve that makes us believe in magic when we know it doesn’t exist.

The other Malick films are Days of Heaven (1978), The Thin Red Line (1998) and The New World (2005). (Legend says he has already shot another film – The Burial – but nothing is known about it.) The first was a story of three young people escaping from the city to a life on the prairie. The second was a version of the James Jones novel about Guadalcanal, in which the impact of war on a Pacific island was felt in the ranting of men, but also in the look of wind and sun on long grass. And the third was the story of John Smith and Pocahontas. In many respects, Badlands was the most compelling narrative and the most conventional movie. Ever since then, Malick has shown every sign of wanting to film the light, the air and insects, so it’s no wonder at last he has reached botany in a title.

How do I know how pleasant he is? I had dinner with him once. He could not have been nicer or more interesting. I forgot he was a film director and came to appreciate him as an intelligent man of the world – and a man who with intricate care has compiled his own legend as an impossible, unreachable recluse.

What can one say about The Tree of Life? Just that for nearly 40 years it has been apparent that Malick might make a movie that could alter our understanding of what cinema should be. This may be it. But it hasn’t opened yet.

(Source: oldfilmsflicker, via iamsambell)

Tree of Life poster.
Because apparently everyone isn’t excited enough yet so they made this beautiful poster. Also look two panels below the word life.

Tree of Life poster.

Because apparently everyone isn’t excited enough yet so they made this beautiful poster. Also look two panels below the word life.

A series of incredible images from Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life that demonstrate his visual flair. He’s also moving into CGI and what he’s done with it is stunning. 

(via cinematiq-deactivated20110403-d)

So this looks beautiful.

Trailer for Tree of Life ~ Terrence Malick

84th Academy Awards Nominations Announced « the diary of a film awards fanatic

iamsambell:

oldfilmsflicker:

These are the categories they announced live, the rest will be added as soon as they’re released.

Best Picture:
The Artist
The Descendants
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
The Help
Hugo
Midnight in Paris
Moneyball
The Tree of Life
War Horse

Best Director:
Michel Hazanavicius – The Artist
Alexander Payne – The Descendants
Martin Scorsese – Hugo
Woody Allen – Midnight in Paris
Terrence Malick – The Tree of Life

Best Actor:
Jean Dujardin – The Artist
Demián Bichir – A Better Life
George Clooney – The Descendants
Brad Pitt – Moneyball
Gary Oldman – Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

Best Actress:
Glenn Close – Albert Nobbs
Rooney Mara – The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Viola Davis – The Help
Meryl Streep – The Iron Lady
Michelle Williams – My Week With Marilyn

Best Supporting Actor:
Christopher Plummer – Beginners
Max Von Sydow – Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close
Jonah Hill – Moneyball
Kenneth Branagh – My Week with Marilyn
Nick Nolte – Warrior

Best Supporting Actress
Janet McTeer – Albert Nobbs
Bérénice Bejo – The Artist
Melissa McCarthy – Bridesmaids
Jessica Chastain – The Help
Octavia Spencer – The Help

Best Animated Feature
A Cat In Paris
Chico and Rita
Kung Fu Panda 2
Puss In Boots
Rango

Best Adapted Screenplay:
The Descendants – Alexander Payne and Nat Faxon & Jim Rash
Hugo – John Logan
The Ides of March – George Clooney and Grant Heslov
Moneyball – Aaron Sorkin, Steven Zaillian and Stan Chervin
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy – Bridget O’Connor and Peter Straughn

Best Original Screenplay:
The Artist – Michel Hazanavicius
Bridesmaids – Kristen Wiig and Annie Mumolo
Margin Call – JC Chandor
Midnight In Paris – Woody Allen
A Separation – Asghar Farhadi

Best Foreign Film
A Separation (Iran)
In Darkness (Poland)
Footnote (Israel)
Bullhead (Belgium)
Monsieur Lazhar (Canada)

I’m extremely happy for Terrence Malick and The Tree of Life, but where is Drive or Melancholia, especially Kirsten Dunst?

EDIT: Oh, and also Shame and Michael Fassbender…

So Iamsambell says pretty much exactly what I was going to say. I will add however what a pleasant surprise it was to see J. C Chandor get a nom for Margin Call, it really was rather excellent, and having seen it on the same day as Moneyball (and thus determining that it is a valid comparison to make) it was significantly better (I liked Moneyball, about as much as I expected to, but it was good and not great which I feel that Margin Call was).

Nevertheless the Oscar’s are always a disappointment and always seem restricted to such obvious choices. I’ll post my predictions at some point, but with little enthusiasm.  

Top 10 Films of 2011

A note about how these were picked: essentially they’re films I saw in the cinema in 2011 and which weren’t rereleases (otherwise both Apocalypse Now and Days of Heaven would be sitting very near the top of the list). Considering I watch a lot of films at Film Unit and that we get films later than most cinemas, I may be including stuff that was technically released in 2010 (I haven’t bothered to check). There’s also one film that I saw very early at a press screening – it’s UK release date was 2012 but I saw it in 2011 so yes, I’ve employed that most strict of criteria: my own viewing schedule. Obviously there’s stuff I didn’t see that would probably warrant a place on this list if I had.

10. Arrietty

9. Tree of Life

8. The Skin I Live In

7. Hanna

6. Melancholia

5. Beginners

4. Animal Kingdom

3. The Guard

2. Shame

1. Drive

 

A few additional comments:

Drive was always going to be top – after seeing it with a few friends none of us could shut up about it for weeks afterwards. I’ve been a fan of Refn for ages and I think he’s turning into one of the best directors currently working. Everything about Drive is pitch perfect. To put it simply: its bloody brilliant.

I kind of feel that Shame is probably a more important work than Drive, but it is also something that I’d struggle to watch again. McQueen is an intense director, both Shame and Hunger are difficult, uncomfortable works but that is precisely what they should be considering the subject matter. McQueen comes across as a master in perfect control of his work – and as ever Fassbender delivers an exceptional performance – definitely the best of the year (though not quite as good as his performance in Hunger).

The Guard was one of those films that completely surpassed my expectations – same with Hanna – I’d heard good things but was essentially unsuspecting of how fantastic they would be.

The Guard has some unsurprising similarities with In Bruges but I felt that it was better in every single way – Gleeson is fantastic, the writing hilarious, and the story more engaging. I was totally unprepared for how emotional it was. I’ve tried (seemingly hopelessly) to try and convince everyone I know to see it – it seems to have drastically overlooked by a lot of people.

Hanna was just kick-ass – it’s rare I enjoy an action film but Hanna was superbly directed and choreographed; a perfect example of how to shoot action without making it a barrage of noise, editing and bewilderment. The soundtrack was of course excellent. The ending located in an abandoned theme park allowed for some quite surreal sequences which I loved. Tom Hollander’s performance was terrifying – that whistle…

Animal Kingdom was breathtaking – dark, tense, and arresting. I had huge expectations for it and it easily surpassed them. It comes across as uncomfortably realistic.

Beginners was, again, a pleasant surprise, wonderfully funny, occasionally heartbreaking and, of course, the lovely Melanie Laurent means it is definitely something I’ll return to. Christopher Plummer deserves every award he gets as well.

Tree of Life actually counts as a disappointment, but my expectations were so high for it that it still warrants a place on the list. It’s unbelievably beautiful and thought-provoking but its deliberately loose structure is tiring at times. Still the universe scenes alone are some of finest scenes ever, and demonstrate the sheer wonder that cinema can provoke.

On a similar not Melancholia provides similar visual thrill, particularly in its opening shots. I was surprised to find that Melancholia  was nowhere near as difficult as I expected (Von Trier does of course have a certain reputation, and his much referred to “no more happy endings” statement affected my expectations). That’s not to say it’s exactly positive, melancholic is the easiest and most obvious description but it is fantastic film-making and a visionary take on depression and the end of the world.

The Skin I Live In was strange, twisted and shocking, as expected. It’s very difficult to describe, but certainly harder to forget.

Arrietty I’ve talked about before, sumptuous, beautiful and charming it is perhaps the easiest film to recommend on this list, if only because I can’t really imagine anyone not liking it.  

You know what made my day?

One month to go!

What Malick does in “The Tree of Life” is create the span of lives. Of birth, childhood, the flush of triumph, the anger of belittlement, the poison of resentment, the warmth of forgiving. And he shows that he feels what I feel, that it was all most real when we were first setting out, and that it will never be real in that way again. In the face of Hunter McCracken, who plays Jack as a boy, we see the face of Sean Penn, who plays him as a man. We see fierceness and pain. We see that he hates his father and loves him. When his father has a talk with him and says, “I was a little hard on you sometimes,” he says, “It’s your house. You can do what you want to.” And we realize how those are not words of anger but actually words of forgiveness. Someday he will be the father. It will not be so easy.
– If there was anyone who I was waiting to write about Tree of Life it was Roger Ebert. And now he has.
parislemon:

Early reaction seems pretty mixed, but I’m very excited for Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life. 

Excellent tweet, although on the subject of mixed reaction, according to Anne Thompson of Indiewire it played rather better at the official première in contrast to the press screening, awarded a “sustained standing ovation”. I for one cannot bloody wait. All I need is someone at the Cannes market to buy it for U.K distribution. 

parislemon:

Early reaction seems pretty mixed, but I’m very excited for Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life

Excellent tweet, although on the subject of mixed reaction, according to Anne Thompson of Indiewire it played rather better at the official première in contrast to the press screening, awarded a “sustained standing ovation”. I for one cannot bloody wait. All I need is someone at the Cannes market to buy it for U.K distribution. 

Fiona Shaw Talks Tree of Life

iamsambell:

‘He made it because he knows it will last’

 [Malick] is the opposite of a director. He rang me up and said, “This is Terrence Malick, I’m doing a film and I wonder could you help me with it.” He said, “I’d like you to write your own part.” I said, “What?!?” and then I wrote this stuff based on the character he described. When we came to filming, he said, “Where would you like to film these scenes? Would you like to do them indoors or outdoors?” because he is so fundamental in his understanding of what he’s doing that it doesn’t really matter to him whether you film it in a garden or a kitchen. He has the thing in his head, it’s not tied to a tiny schedule. He makes them with handheld cameras, in natural light in the town he’s taken over.”

Fuck you Icon.

David Thomson on Terrence Malick | Film | The Guardian

He may be the only film-maker working now to whom the word “magical” can be applied, yet in nearly 30 years he has directed just five films. He has a degree in philosophy from Harvard; he taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; he has published a translation of Heidegger’s Vom Wesen des Grundes. He has a reputation as a recluse, whereas in reality he is a charming, amiable fellow happy to talk about a wide range of topics – but not film. He came close once to doing a film of Walker Percy’s novel The Moviegoer, and in 1999 he did produce a picture about the great Ethiopian runner, Haile Gebrselassie, called Endurance. Then a year later he produced another documentary, The Endurance, about the polar explorer Ernest Shackleton.

And his fifth film, The Tree of Life, is supposed to have its world premiere in London on 4 May – yet it may not. It is a while since a Terrence Malick film opened according to expectations.

Why “magical”? It’s not just the uncertainty Malick spreads around himself – the Cannes film festival this year also hopes to have the world premiere of The Tree of Life, or even that there are rival contenders for which company has the right to release it. Far more, there is the legend whereby the film was conceived a long time ago and shot in 2009 (mostly in Texas), but that no one knows or will say what it’s about. There are vague reports that it concerns a boy from the 1950s who becomes a man, and there is a trailer (gorgeously beautiful and arresting) that suggests Sean Penn could be the grown man with Brad Pitt as his father. There is the conundrum as to whether it’s a small story about life or a vast portrait of Life. Why not both? Why not an actual tree (apparently an ancient oak in Texas) and the tree of life on which we are all leaves or bark?

What is “magical”? Well, it’s always the pristine imagery and the serene reach of a Malick film. This has been so since Badlands (1973), a version of the Charles Starkweather case, in which a kid and his girl went on a casual rampage of killing, which is also a vision of the first children in a flat-faced Eden. But it’s magic, too, because in this age of diminution and vulgarity at the movies, Malick conducts himself with the austerity of Chaplin and Kubrick – doing it his way, disdaining the press, but getting people to pay for it all. Never forget that a movie director is not just a master of imagery and drama, a conductor of actors, music and design. He is a guy who can persuade someone to put up millions on an airy conversation about life, plants, astronomy and philosophy. This is more than magic. It is the nerve that makes us believe in magic when we know it doesn’t exist.

The other Malick films are Days of Heaven (1978), The Thin Red Line (1998) and The New World (2005). (Legend says he has already shot another film – The Burial – but nothing is known about it.) The first was a story of three young people escaping from the city to a life on the prairie. The second was a version of the James Jones novel about Guadalcanal, in which the impact of war on a Pacific island was felt in the ranting of men, but also in the look of wind and sun on long grass. And the third was the story of John Smith and Pocahontas. In many respects, Badlands was the most compelling narrative and the most conventional movie. Ever since then, Malick has shown every sign of wanting to film the light, the air and insects, so it’s no wonder at last he has reached botany in a title.

How do I know how pleasant he is? I had dinner with him once. He could not have been nicer or more interesting. I forgot he was a film director and came to appreciate him as an intelligent man of the world – and a man who with intricate care has compiled his own legend as an impossible, unreachable recluse.

What can one say about The Tree of Life? Just that for nearly 40 years it has been apparent that Malick might make a movie that could alter our understanding of what cinema should be. This may be it. But it hasn’t opened yet.

(Source: oldfilmsflicker, via iamsambell)

Tree of Life poster.
Because apparently everyone isn’t excited enough yet so they made this beautiful poster. Also look two panels below the word life.

Tree of Life poster.

Because apparently everyone isn’t excited enough yet so they made this beautiful poster. Also look two panels below the word life.

A series of incredible images from Terrence Malick’s Tree of Life that demonstrate his visual flair. He’s also moving into CGI and what he’s done with it is stunning. 

(via cinematiq-deactivated20110403-d)

So this looks beautiful.

Trailer for Tree of Life ~ Terrence Malick

Top 10 Films of 2011
"What Malick does in “The Tree of Life” is create the span of lives. Of birth, childhood, the flush of triumph, the anger of belittlement, the poison of resentment, the warmth of forgiving. And he shows that he feels what I feel, that it was all most real when we were first setting out, and that it will never be real in that way again. In the face of Hunter McCracken, who plays Jack as a boy, we see the face of Sean Penn, who plays him as a man. We see fierceness and pain. We see that he hates his father and loves him. When his father has a talk with him and says, “I was a little hard on you sometimes,” he says, “It’s your house. You can do what you want to.” And we realize how those are not words of anger but actually words of forgiveness. Someday he will be the father. It will not be so easy."

About:

A collection of literature, film, politics, music and art; with occasional comment. Credit given where possible.

Philosophy and Politics undergrad student at the University of Sheffield.

Following: